Hi, On 2025-08-05 19:20:20 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 31.07.25 19:17, Tom Lane wrote: > > Also I see a "// XXX" in pg_get_aios, which I guess is a note > > to confirm the data type to use for ioh_id? > > Yes, the stuff returned from pgaio_io_get_id() should be int, but some code > uses uint32, and also UINT32_MAX as a special marker. Here is a patch that > tries to straighten that out by using int consistently and -1 as a special > marker.
> From e1bb97e13af226cd15c9a59929aef48bc92c4ac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2025 19:16:38 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Use consistent type for pgaio_io_get_id() result > > The result of pgaio_io_get_id() was being assigned to a mix of int and > uint32 variables. This fixes it to use int consistently, which seems > the most correct. Also change the queue empty special value in > method_worker.c to -1 from UINT32_MAX. WFM. I guess I could see some value going with an unsigned value instead of a signed one, but it really doesn't matter... Greetings, Andres
