On Wed, Aug 6, 2025 at 7:16 PM John Naylor <johncnaylo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > BTW, I see that you applied ed26c4e25 only to master, but don't > > we want to back-patch? cpluspluscheck is not just an exercise in a > > vacuum, it's to ensure that C++-coded extensions don't have trouble > > with our headers. > > I was thinking that it was run only when developing new features, not > for backpatch-able bug fixes, but that's a flawed assumption. I'll > remedy that soon along with the new symbols above, unless you beat me > to it.
This is done. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
