On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 12:09:28PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2025 at 09:20:09PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> That explains it. I didn't find any past discussions about this particular >> name, but commit de160e2 was being developed concurrently. I'll use >> nameSpace instead. > > Committed.
Any thoughts on back-patching this? It's entirely cosmetic and could help avoid some back-patching pain down the road. I originally chose not to back-patch because it's not a bug and "namspace" has been there for a very long time, but now I'm having second thoughts... -- nathan
