Thanks for testing! > Why is it necessary to allocate a new dsa_pointer for tranche names that are > the same size and then > free the old one? > Is there a reason we can't just assign new_ptrs[i] = old_ptrs[i]?
Fair point. I will updated in the next rev. We don't need to free the' existing tranche name pointers, only the list. > Would it be possible to update LWLockInitialize so that it checks if > tranche_id is > already registered in the dsa, and if not, registers it during the > LWLockInitialize() process? We could. I do think this will need a separate discussion as a follow-up to this thread. -- Sami
