On Sunday, August 3, 2025, Peter Smith <smithpb2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Recently, I learned it is possible to say: > > CREATE PUBLICATION pub ... WITH (publish_generated_columns); > > This is equivalent to: > CREATE PUBLICATION pub ... WITH (publish_generated_columns = stored); > > > What is the verdict for this syntax -- ok or not?
Not. An enum should not allow for an omitted value. The documented policy of only booleans being allowed an optional value is what is expected. I’d say this is a new-in-18 bug that should be fixed in the code. The documentation is correct - absence of the option means “none”, presence requires an explicit value and not its own missing-value default. David J.
