> another question is: > should we first implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'template') for limited > types > (to_date, to_char, to_number, to_timestamptz) > or first try to make it more generic? > > That was my plan, essentially rewriting these into safe versions of the existing to_date/to_timestamp/etc functions, but much has changed since then, so while it still seems like a good intermediate step, it may be a distraction as others have stated elsewhere in the thread.
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'template') Vik Fearing
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'template') jian he
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'templat... David G. Johnston
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT 'tem... jian he
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... Vik Fearing
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... jian he
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... David G. Johnston
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... Corey Huinker
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... David G. Johnston
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... Vik Fearing
- Re: implement CAST(expr AS type FORMAT ... Corey Huinker