On Sun, Jul 27, 2025 at 6:56 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@alvh.no-ip.org> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here's a patch to add REPACK and eventually the CONCURRENTLY flag to it.
> This is coming from [1]. The ultimate goal is to have an in-core tool
> to allow concurrent table rewrite to get rid of bloat;
+1
> right now, VACUUM
> FULL does that, but it's not concurrent. Users have resorted to using
> the pg_repack third-party tool, which is ancient and uses a weird
> internal implementation, as well as pg_squeeze, which uses logical
> decoding to capture changes that occur during the table rewrite. The
> patch submitted here, largely by Antonin Houska with some changes by me,
> is based on the the pg_squeeze code which he authored, and first
> introduces a new command called REPACK to absorb both VACUUM FULL and
> CLUSTER, followed by addition of a CONCURRENTLY flag to allow some forms
> of REPACK to operate online using logical decoding.
Does this mean REPACK CONCURRENTLY requires wal_level = logical,
while plain REPACK (without CONCURRENTLY) works with any wal_level
setting? If we eventually deprecate VACUUM FULL and CLUSTER,
I think plain REPACK should still be allowed with wal_level = minimal
or replica, so users with those settings can perform equivalent
processing.
+ if (!cluster_is_permitted_for_relation(tableOid, userid,
+ CLUSTER_COMMAND_CLUSTER))
As for the patch you attached, it seems to be an early WIP and
might not be ready for review yet?? BTW, I got the following
compilation failure and probably CLUSTER_COMMAND_CLUSTER
the above should be GetUserId().
-----------------
cluster.c:455:14: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CLUSTER_COMMAND_CLUSTER'
455 |
CLUSTER_COMMAND_CLUSTER))
|
^
1 error generated.
-----------------
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
