On 2025-Jul-23, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 05:38:34PM +0200, Álvaro Herrera wrote:
> > I noticed some duplicative coding while hacking on REPACK[1]. We can
> > save a few lines now with a trivial change to the rules for CHECKPOINT
> > and REINDEX, and allow to save a few extra lines in that patch.
> >
> > Any objections to this?
>
> Seems reasonable to me. Any chance we can use this for CLUSTER, VACUUM,
> ANALYZE, and EXPLAIN, too?
ANALYZE and VACUUM cannot be changed this way, because the productions
where options are optional are the legacy ones; so running
"VACUUM/ANALYZE table" uses that one, and we cannot change that:
VacuumStmt: VACUUM opt_full opt_freeze opt_verbose opt_analyze
opt_vacuum_relation_list
EXPLAIN doesn't work because the '(' starts either a query (via
select_with_parens) or an option list, so you get a shift/reduce
conflict.
I hadn't looked at CLUSTER, because the REPACK patch is absorbing that
rule into a larger rule for both REPACK and CLUSTER. But now that I
look again, I realize that apparently my REPACK branch is bogus, because
I forgot to add a production for "CLUSTER name ON qualified_name". And
with that one put back, I cannot use opt_utility_option_list there
either, because the above conflicts with "CLUSTER
opt_utility_option_list qualified_name cluster_index_specification".
So we can still do this, and I still think it's a win, but unfortunately
it won't help for the REPACK patch.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Voy a acabar con todos los humanos / con los humanos yo acabaré
voy a acabar con todos (bis) / con todos los humanos acabaré ¡acabaré! (Bender)
