On 2025-Jul-22, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > If we were making up our own syntax this would be a sensible thing to > debate. If we're talking about implementing something we expect to be in the > standard, I think we will have to live with what the standards committee > decides, regardless of our preference. We've almost certainly been preempted > here by other RDBMSs using QUALIFY, heedless of English grammar.
The Romans, the Vikings, the Normans, all have influenced the English language. Why not SQL? -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ “Cuando no hay humildad las personas se degradan” (A. Christie)
