On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 19:28, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Maxim Orlov <orlo...@gmail.com> writes: > > 1) Can this behaviour, in the case described above, when after dump and > > recovery we receive different data, be considered correct? > > It's undesirable, for sure. > > > 4) Does it make sense to extend the "simple case" grammar so that it can > > accept a custom operator? > > This has been discussed before, see e.g. [1][2]. Unfortunately CASE > > [1] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20141009200031.25464.53769%40wrigleys.postgresql.org > [2] > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/10492.1531515255%40sss.pgh.pa.us#8755318d9b16ec32296398f0893a44d7
Thank you for pointing this out. I'll have to read those discussions. -- Best regards, Maxim Orlov.
