On Mon, Jun 23, 2025 at 5:19 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > As far as I recall, we've always thought that autoconf's approach > of "explicitly specify the features you expect to get" is the > right way to do things. I don't love meson's default you-get- > whatever-seems-available approach at all, though maybe that's > my history as a package builder talking. I think not using that > behavior would be a real good idea, at least for testing purposes.
For development I like "give me everything" by default, but for testing and packaging I agree with you. --Jacob
