Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> So that's
> 1) return an (empty) cancellation object even if the server has not
> sent a key, and
> 2) error out when trying to cancel with an empty object?
> That sounds reasonable to me.
+1.
> Are there any reading along who want us to continue sending an
> all-zeroes CancelRequest if the server has not sent a key?
We might have to consider doing so if evidence emerges of a server
that depends on us doing that, but right now we have no such evidence.
On the whole, reporting an error seems like a better user experience
than silently sending a cancel we know won't work. But we have to
delay the error until a cancel is actually attempted.
regards, tom lane
