On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 at 18:29, Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: > Initial thoughts:
below my reasoning (feel free to disagree). > - "dblink" seems overly specific compared to the others. It seemed roughly as specific as postgres_fdw to me. Maybe we should make sure they are grouped more alphabetically. contrib/dblink contrib/postgres_fdw (or in a different format like "Contrib - dblink") > - "Backport" seems strange. That's what the Version column is for, no? I still don't know how I'm supposed to use the version column (e.g. what is the difference between stable and pg19), and it seems out of date or not filled in half of the time. So I'd rather have it replaced with tags with clear intent. Maybe have backport tags for each Postgres version instead of "Backport - PG16" etc. The assumption being, if it doesn't have a backport tag, then it should go into master. > - "Comments Only" feels somehow... standoffish? defensive? How about > "Comments [Requested/Needed]" or something similar? I meant this as "This patch changes only comments", the hover text also explains that once selected. > (Who added the existing ones?) Me, as part of the database migration that added support for tags.
