On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 7:27 PM Alexander Borisov <lex.bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 11.06.2025 10:13, John Naylor wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 3, 2025 at 1:51 PM Alexander Borisov <lex.bori...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> 5. The server part "lost weight" in the binary, but the frontend > >> "gained weight" a little. > >> > >> I read the old commits, which say that the size of the frontend is very > >> important and that speed is not important > >> (speed is important on the server). > >> I'm not quite sure what to do if this is really the case. Perhaps > >> we should leave the slow version for the frontend. > > > > In the "small" patch, the frontend files got a few kB bigger, but the > > backend got quite a bit smaller. If we decided to go with this patch, > > I'd say it's preferable to do it in a way that keeps both paths the > > same. > > Okay, then I'll leave the frontend unchanged so that the size remains > the same. The changes will only affect the backend.
Sorry, I by "both paths" I meant make the frontend and backend the same, because it's good for testing. In the "small table" patch, libpq etc increase by about 1%, which is negligible. unicode_norm.o is only bigger by 7kB -- That seems okay to me, especially considering unicode_norm_srv.o is smaller by 27kB. > From these tests, we see 2x in some tests. Nice! -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
