On Sat, Jun 7, 2025 at 4:34 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > BTW I found that the constant 'maxblkno' in test_tidstore.sql actually > equals to InvalidBlockNumber, but not MaxBlockNumber. I think it > doesn't make sense that TidStore uses InvalidBlockNumber as the key. > The attached 0001 patch fixes it. I think we can fix it separately on > HEAD as well as back branches.
I don't see a bug here, so I don't see the need for a backpatch -- the block numbers in the tests are just numbers, they don't refer to actual relations. I understand the desire to make it closer to reality, but it seems cosmetic. -- John Naylor Amazon Web Services
