On Sat, May 31, 2025 at 01:26:14PM +0700, Daniil Davydov wrote: > Not yet. I proceed from the assumption that if the temp_buffers > parameter is set to a large value (some users set it to more than a > gigabyte), then the vast majority of time is spent iterating through > the local buffers. > Thus, if we reduce the number of iterations from N to (for example) > N/10, we can get a 10x increase in performance. Of course, this is a > super rough assumption, but I think you understand my point. > In the near future I will prepare a patch for the idea above and try > to do some measurements. If there is a significant difference, I will > definitely let you know. > > Anyway, first I suggest committing the current patch.
I doubt that it would be a good idea to apply a patch "just" because it looks like a good idea. It is important to prove that something is a good idea first. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
