Re: Nathan Bossart
> This patch also adds an IMMEDIATE option, which I proposed some time ago
> [0]. I ended up withdrawing it due to general skepticism about its
Thanks for the pointer, I did not go that far back when looking for
older threads.
When writing the patch, I was also thinking about naming the option
"fast" or "spread" but ultimately went with "immediate" because that's
what the log message is using:
=# checkpoint;
2025-05-30 18:23:17.433 CEST [579834] LOG: Checkpoint beginnt: immediate force
wait
SQL command "(options)" tend to be booleans, hence "immediate {on|off}".
Introducing two separate keywords "fast" and "spread" seemed
confusing, and there is no precedent for "fast=on" in other tools or
the replication protocol.
> usefulness. FWIW I have no concerns about adding a few retail options to
> CHECKPOINT, but others might balk at options without solid use-cases. The
> unlogged table one seems reasonable enough.
I think the two options immediate and flush_all are actually useful in
combination for the shutdown case. If operation is to continue
normally until just before the shutdown, it might make sense to run
these 3 commands (or just #1 and #3):
checkpoint (flush_all, immediate false);
checkpoint (flush_all);
pg_ctl stop
(I also thought about a VERBOSE option, but since the checkpoint
messages are generated by a different process, it's probably harder
than I initially thought.)
Christoph
