On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 10:36:54PM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote: > On Tue, 2025-05-20 at 16:28 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Well, we do have a right, e.g., we would not allow someone to repeatedly > > post patches for a Postgres extension we don't manage, or the jdbc > > driver. I also don't think we would allow someone to continue posting > > patches for a feature we have decided to reject, and I think we have > > decided to reject the patch in in its current form. I think we might > > accept a trimmed-down version, but I don't see the patch moving in that > > direction. > > > > Now, of course, if I am the only one who feels this way, I can suppress > > these emails on my end. > > In my opinion, this patch set is adding something that would be valuable to > have in core. > > If no committer intends to pick it up and commit it, I think the proper > action would be to step up and reject the patch set, not complain about the > insistence of the author.
Are you saying I should not complain until we have officially rejected the patch set? If we officially reject it, the patch author would no longer post it? -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Do not let urgent matters crowd out time for investment in the future.
