Re: Small fixes needed by high-availability tools

[Andrey Borodin]

> On 14 May 2025, at 05:33, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> It might not necessarily be a flag—it could be some LSN value instead.
>> Also, it's not just about a "new transaction," but about any new
>> snapshot that could see data not yet replicated to the synchronous
>> standby.
>> 
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me. Let us see what others think about it.

I think this LSN is simply LSN where crash recovery ends...


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.