=?utf-8?Q?=C3=81lvaro?= Herrera <alvhe...@kurilemu.de> writes: > On 2025-May-08, Tom Lane wrote: >> So it seems like valgrind is wrong here, or else we're leaking the >> whole rd_att structure later on somehow.
> Well, the problem is that if num_check is zero, FreeTupleDesc() doesn't
> free ->check.
Ah-hah.
> Done that way, thanks.
Thanks! I've been putting together a list of fixes to make
Valgrind less noisy, and it just got one shorter.
regards, tom lane
