On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 7:35 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 11:05:56AM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote: > >> Does it make sense to load "shared_preload_libraries" during binary > >> upgrade mode? > > > Well, the library might be required to load the data. Why would we > > avoid it with no known error reports? > > You could invent examples that would break things in either direction. > I'm inclined to leave it alone, because right now the choice is under > the user's control: she can adjust shared_preload_libraries if needed > in either the source or target clusters. If we try to force the > matter, then one set of problem cases is broken without recourse.
Yeah, that makes sense, so let's leave it alone. Thanks. -- Regards, Dilip Kumar EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
