On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 5:24 PM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > Attached is a current v4 with a few small tweaks.
Sorry to turn up late here, but I strongly disagree with the notion that this is a bug in the DSM or DSA code. It seems to me that it is the caller's responsibility to provide a valid resource owner, not the job of the called code to ignore the resource owner when it's unusable. I suspect that there are many other parts of the system that rely on the ResourceOwner machinery which likewise assume that the ResourceOwner that they are passed is valid. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
