Thanks for the feedback, Thomas. > No comment on the wider project except that it looks generally useful, > and I can see that it's not possible to use the conventional POSIX > filename "-" to represent stdout, because you need to write to > multiple files so you need to come up with *something* along the lines > you're proposing here. But I was interested in seeing if I could help > with that technical problem you mentioned above, and I don't see that > happening with the current patches. Do I understand correctly that > the problem you encountered is in some other tests that you haven't > attached yet? Could you post what you have so that others can see the > problem and perhaps have a chance of helping?
Yes, we didn't add the failed tests to the patch. We'll add those and send new patches. > I also recommend using > git format-patch when you post patches so that you have a place to > write a commit message including a note about which bits are WIP and > known not to work correctly yet. Will follow these recommendations when sending the next set of patches. Regards, Nitin Motiani Google
