On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 05:53, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat....@gmail.com> wrote:
> If there's any problem, IMO, ALTER TABLE ... RENAME ... should rename the > sequence too since the identity sequences are created implicitly when the > table is created, so they should be renamed implicitly. We should not > require WITH SEQUENCE clause. > My concern would be what happens if the new sequence name is not available. I suppose the simplest behaviour might be to skip renaming the sequence in that case, perhaps raising a warning.
