Hi, On Wed, 2025-04-23 at 11:48 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote: > unless we added multiple WAL streams. That would allow for splitting > WAL traffic across multiple devices as well as providing better > support for configurations that don’t replicate the entire cluster. > The current situation where delayed replication of a single table > mandates retention of all the WAL for the entire cluster is less than > ideal.
I think the problem is handling the stream of global objects. Having separate stream for each database would be awesome as long as it can deal with the "global stream". Regards, -- Devrim Gündüz Open Source Solution Architect, PostgreSQL Major Contributor BlueSky: @devrim.gunduz.org , @gunduz.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
