On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 06:22:51AM +0000, Bertrand Drouvot wrote: > Yeah, unless that might come from fc415edf8ca but I don't think that's the > case.
I've been eyeing this whole area of the code for a few hours to convince myself on HEAD, and I cannot really find a defect directly related to it. I am wondering if we should do a PGSTAT_BACKEND_FLUSH_WAL in the WAL sender, but the end of any transaction happening in a logical WAL sender would make sure that this happens on a periodic basis. Anyway, sorry for make everybody waiting here. I've now removed the assertion down to v15. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
