Thank you for the review! I appreciate your detailed feedback. Regarding "to to" and "that that", I agree that they might be technically acceptable. However, I personally find them a bit harder to parse and they increase the chance of misreading for me. Your suggested alternative for "to to" is much clearer!
Ultimately, if leaving them as-is is perfectly fine, I'm happy to defer to your judgment. But I would certainly welcome the improvement if you decide to revise those phrases. Thanks again for your time and consideration. 2025年4月21日(月) 13:03 David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com>: > > On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 at 15:06, Noboru Saito <noboru...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 1. Remove unnecessary blank lines (blankline.diff) > > Looks good. > > > 2. Fix repeated "to to" in several command reference files (toto.diff) > > - Specifies the name of the database to connect to to discover which > + Specifies the name of the database to connect to discover which > > What's there is acceptable English, but it's maybe confusing to a > non-native speaker and might be worth adjusting so it's easier to > parse. "connect to to discover" is just short for "connect to in order > to discover". If it's confusing, maybe we could rephrase the whole > sentence. How about: > > "When the <option>-a</option>/<option>--all</option> is used, connect > to this database to gather the list of databases to vacuum." > > > 3. Fix period instead of comma in enumeration (comma.diff) > > Looks good. > > > 4. Standardize inline tags in libpq documentation (tagmiss.diff) > > Looks good. > > > 5. Remove redundant "that that" constructions (thatthat.diff) > > I don't see anything wrong here. [1] does a better job of explaining > #5 than I can. > > David > > [1] > https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/492349/is-my-use-of-that-that-in-this-sentence-gramaticaly-correct
