Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@oss.nttdata.com> writes: > Thanks for the report and patch! It looks good to me.
Agreed.
> Since this issue exists in the back branches,
> the patch needs be back-patched to all supported versions.
I doubt it's worth the trouble and buildfarm cycles to
back-patch, since this should be a can't-happen code path.
Worth fixing in HEAD, yes, but not convinced about doing
more than that.
regards, tom lane
