Hi, On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 at 16:50, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2025 at 02:40:52AM -0400, Andres Freund wrote: > > I think it's ok for now. It might be worth doing a larger redesign of the > > pgbuffercache docs at some point... > > > > > > Pushed. > > > > > > Thanks for your patches and thanks for all the reviewers getting this ready! > > Thanks for the patch! That sounds like a great addition. I was doing some > tests and did not see any issues.
Thank you for looking into this! > Also while doing the tests I thouhgt that it > could be useful to evict only from a subset of NUMA nodes (now that NUMA > awareness is in). We'd need to figure out what to do for buffers that are > spread > across NUMA nodes though. > > Does that sound like an idea worth to spend time on? (If so, I'd be happy to > work > on it). I think it looks useful, but I’m not too familiar with NUMA, so I’m not sure I can say much with confidence. Maybe someone else can chime in with a more solid take? -- Regards, Nazir Bilal Yavuz Microsoft
