Hi Ajin, Here is another general review comment for patch 0001.
~~~ I keep getting confused by the distinction between the 2 member fields that are often found working hand-in-hand: entry->filterable rb->can_filter_change Unfortunately, because the names are very similar I keep blurring the meanings, and then nothing makes sense. IIUC, the meanings are actually like: entry->filterable. This means filtering is *possible* for this kind of relation; it doesn't mean it will happen though. rb->can_filter_change. This means the plugin will *try* to filter the change; it might do nothing if entry->filterable is false; can_filter_change bool is used for the 100 change "temporary suspension" logic (e.g. so it if is false we won't even try to filter despite entry->filterable is true). If those meanings are accurate I think some better member names might be: entry->filterable rb->try_to_filter_change Also these explanations/distinctions need to be made more clearly in the commit message and/of file head comments, as well as where those members are defined. ====== Kind Regards, Peter Smith. Fujitsu Australia.