On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 3:54 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > A related point that I'm noticing is that you record the not-NULL > > information in the RangeTblEntry. > > Did we not just complain about that w.r.t. the v1 version of this > patch? RangeTblEntry is not where to store this info. We need > a new data structure, and IMO the data structure should be a hashtable > based on table OID, not relid. That way we can amortize across > multiple references to the same table within a query.
It's not quite the same complaint, because the earlier complaint was that it was actually being done at parse time, and this complaint is that it is scribbling on a parse-time data structure. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
