Hi, Working on rebasing the pluggable storage patch on the current version of this.
On 2018-07-26 17:09:08 +0530, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > Done. I also noticed that slot_getattr() optimizes the cases when the > requested attributes is NULL or is missing from a tuple. Given that a > custom TupleTableSlot type can have its own optimizations for the > same, added a new call back getattr() to obtain value of a given > attribute from slot. The callback is called from slot_getattr(). I'm quite against this. This is just proliferation of callbacks without much use. Why do you think this is helpful? I think it's much better to go back to a single callback to deform here. Greetings, Andres Freund