On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 10:32:40PM -0400, Andres Freund wrote: > I think this would all be a nice argument to have when introducing a new > function. But I don't think it's a wart sufficiently big to justify breaking > compatibility.
Yeah, I would side as well with the compatibility argument on this one. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
