On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 3:04 AM Andrei Lepikhov <lepi...@gmail.com> wrote: > I'm sorry, I was confused; previously, the difficulties faced by > extension developers were always attributed to him (refer to the > discussion on the selectivity hook). However, now you're introducing a > hook for a trivial operation that could simply be resolved at the end of > execution within a per-node hook with tiny inconsistency in output. I'm > pleased to see a change in the narrative.
It sounds like we're sufficiently in agreement so I've committed the patch. I agree with you that this could be done within the per-node hook, but that would be awkward, and this is better. I take note of your frustration with the difficulty of getting hooks added and to some extent I share it; on the flip side, there are plenty of poorly-considered hook proposals, too. I've rebased my pg_overexplain patch and attach that here. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
v8-0001-pg_overexplain-Additional-EXPLAIN-options-for-deb.patch
Description: Binary data
