On Wed, Apr 02, 2025 at 05:29:00PM -0700, Noah Misch wrote: > Your back-patches are correct. Thanks.
Thanks for double-checking. I'll move on with what I have after a second look as it's been a few weeks since I've looked at all these conflicts. I am also planning to add a few notes in the commits to mention this thread. > Here it is. Making it fail three times took looping 1383s, 5841s, and 2594s. > Hence, it couldn't be expected to catch the regression before commit, but it > would have made sufficient buildfarm and CI noise in the day after commit. Hmm. Not much of a fan of the addition of a test that has less than 1% of reproducibility for the problem, even if it's good to see that this can be made portable to run down to v13. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
