John Naylor <johncnaylo...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 6:04 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> In short, I think we ought to apply and perhaps back-patch something
>> like the attached.
> Seems like reasonable defensive coding and consistency.
Thanks for looking at it.
> I'd be okay with keeping the original comment, though, since it seems
> to be explaining the choice well enough.
Okay.
>> BTW, it looks to me like PGAC_AVX512_POPCNT_INTRINSICS is at similar
>> hazard, but I'm not entirely sure how to fix that one.
> "buf" is the variable there that we're loading from, so that would be
> the one to make global.
Ah. I was confused by the "const" decoration, but we can remove that.
After thinking for a bit, I pushed this just to master rather than
back-patching. We can do a back-patch if anyone discovers that this
is a live issue on any current platform, but I rather suspect that
it isn't. Compiler not matched to platform is a situation that's
gone away for most people.
regards, tom lane
