On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 6:12 AM Daniel Gustafsson <dan...@yesql.se> wrote: > > > On 1 Apr 2025, at 15:03, Christoph Berg <m...@debian.org> wrote: > > > With the libpq-oauth split, this makes even more sense because > > building a library that always throws an error isn't very useful. > > (Don't build that file at all if the feature doesn't work.) > > After the split, configure/meson should fail if the libcurl dependency isn't > satisfied or if the platform isn't supported.
Yeah, after sleeping on it I agree. If I want a "canary" buildfarm animal to opt into compilation on unsupported platforms, I can instead look into a manual #define or something; it doesn't have to be a supported configure-time thing. > > Since oauth/curl have some security implications, would it make more > > sense to call the switch --enable-oauth (-Doauth) so users could > > control better what features their libpq is going to have? Perhaps > > some other feature (pg_service as URL?) is going to need libcurl as > > well, but it should be configurable separately. > > Perhaps --with-oauth-client for the opt-in libpq-oauth? It started as -Doauth way back when, but was changed as part of the discussion at [1]. Peter, do you have any objections to switching back to an OAuth-related name? --Jacob [1] https://postgr.es/m/6bde5f56-9e7a-4148-b81c-eb6532cb3651%40eisentraut.org