On 2025-Mar-28, Tom Lane wrote: > I think instead of going this direction, we really need to create a > separately-purposed script that simply creates "one of everything" > without doing anything else (except maybe loading a little data). > I believe it'd be a lot easier to remember to add to that when > inventing new SQL than to remember to leave something behind from the > core regression tests. This would also be far faster to run than any > approach that involves picking a random subset of the core test > scripts.
FWIW this sounds closely related to what I tried to do with src/test/modules/test_ddl_deparse; it's currently incomplete, but maybe we can use that as a starting point. -- Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/ "Always assume the user will do much worse than the stupidest thing you can imagine." (Julien PUYDT)
