On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 11:35:15AM -0600, Sami Imseih wrote: > Thanks for the update. This LGTM! and I will mark as RFC.
Yes, agreed that there is no specific need to be precise about the attributes that can become inconsistent, as this would also depend on the addition of more states, or event more attributes. The wording of v3 is OK by me, so applied. Perhaps this could be tweaked more, so if there are any comments, feel free. -- Michael
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
