On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:12 PM Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 4:08 PM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > I was down on it to start with, on the grounds that it wasn't adding > > enough ease-of-use to justify even a relatively small amount of added > > code. I'm not sure that the dump-reload failure angle is much of a > > concern in reality, but I would have voted not to commit before and > > I still do. > > OK, fair. Anyone want to argue the other side?
Apparently not, hence I am marking this Rejected. -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com