On Tue, Mar 25, 2025 at 09:41:21PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 6:00 AM Peter Eisentraut <pe...@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>> I agree with your patch 0001-Deprecate-pg_int64.patch. I don't see a
>> reason to keep the current arrangement around pg_int64.
>
> Thanks for looking! Pushed.
anaconda seems to be upset about this one [0]. I've spent all of 30
seconds looking at it so far, but it appears to be using an old version of
the header file.
In file included from pg_regress.c:34:
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:623:8: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
623 | extern pg_int64 lo_lseek64(PGconn *conn, int fd, pg_int64 offset, int
whence);
| ^
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:623:50: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
623 | extern pg_int64 lo_lseek64(PGconn *conn, int fd, pg_int64 offset, int
whence);
| ^
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:627:8: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
627 | extern pg_int64 lo_tell64(PGconn *conn, int fd);
| ^
/usr/local/include/libpq-fe.h:629:48: error: unknown type name 'pg_int64'
629 | extern int lo_truncate64(PGconn *conn, int fd, pg_int64 len);
| ^
4 errors generated.
[0]
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=anaconda&dt=2025-03-25%2021%3A22%3A33
--
nathan
