Re: Using read_stream in index vacuum

[Andrey Borodin]

> On 18 Mar 2025, at 23:21, Melanie Plageman <melanieplage...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I actually think you could do the test with one injection point and
> just wait on it twice

I was not sure we can safely wake up on injection point and stop and the same 
point on next iteration.
But, apparently, it is safe, due to wait_counts in InjectionPointSharedState.

So, yes, your change to the test seems correct to me. We can do the test with 
just one injection point.


Best regards, Andrey Borodin.