On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 7:06 PM David Rowley <dgrowle...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 at 05:49, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've attached the patch. I added the minimum regression tests for that. > > I think the change to vacuumlazy.c is ok. The new test you've added > creates a table called pvactst2 but then adds a test that uses the > pvactst table.
Fixed. > Did you mean to skip the DROP TABLE pvactst2;? Yes, added DROP TABLE pvactst2. > Is there a reason to keep the maintenance_work_mem=64 for the > subsequent existing test? No, I reset it immediately after tests for pvactst2. I've attached the updated patch. Regards, -- Masahiko Sawada Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
v2-0001-Fix-assertion-failure-in-parallel-vacuum-with-min.patch
Description: Binary data
