> On 18 Mar 2025, at 16:07, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2025-03-18 10:45:41 +0100, Daniel Gustafsson wrote: >> Thanks for doing that, I'll try to get this in during a break in todays >> conference. > > Thanks to both of you for fixing this!
No worries, this has now been committed. Whether or not we can do anything for backbranches is another discussion. > I wonder how we could make it easier to find stuff like this and 274bbced853, > it's pretty painful right now. The SSLKEYLOGFILE stuff being discussed would > help, but would still require somebody breaking out wireshark or such. > Perhaps some added trace messages or such? Maybe, but I fear that most of the interesting tracepoints would be inside OpenSSL rather than in libpq. Definitely worth investigatint though. -- Daniel Gustafsson
