Hi, On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 7:53 PM vignesh C <vignes...@gmail.com> wrote: > I noticed that the following Andrey's comment regarding the isolation > test from [1] and Andres's comment from [2] are pending. I'm changing > the commitfest entry to Waiting on Author, please provide an updated > patch and update it to Needs review.
Thanks for reading it. I saw [2] and introduced a possible solution in my last letter. In short : we can have a GUC variable that will permit superuser to drop temp tables of other sessions. Thus, we have a single location in code that will check whether we can perform operations with other temp tables. As far as I understand, this is exactly what Andres wrote about. Also, it is difficult for me to express my opinion on [1] at the moment. I can say for sure that the tests will change when we agree on the behavior of the code. Therefore, I suggest postponing the resolution of this issue. > I suggest adding a GUC that will allow superuser to do this Waiting for your feedback on this issue :) -- Best regards, Daniil Davydov
