On 2025/03/13 0:32, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
Fair enough. The code is more readable this way. That itself is an improvement.

I stared at c4d5cb71d229095a39fda1121a75ee40e6069a2a to see whether
there's any reason this was left aside at that time. I am convinced
that it was just missed. I think this patch is good to be committed.

Thanks for reviewing the patch and confirming! I've pushed the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



Reply via email to