Jacob Champion <jacob.champ...@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Adding the PG prefix to the envvar name addresses my collision
> concern, but I think Tom's comment upthread [1] was saying that we
> should not provide any envvar at all:
>> I think it might be safer if we only accepted it as a connection
>> parameter and not via an environment variable.
> Is the addition of the PG prefix enough to address that concern too?
Indeed, I was advocating for *no* environment variable. The PG prefix
does not comfort me.
regards, tom lane
