On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 9:48 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:54 AM Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> BTW, I am planning to commit this only on HEAD as this is a behavior > > >> change. Please let me know if you guys think otherwise. > > > > > > > > > Somehow this looks like a bug fix which should be backported no? Am I > > > missing something? > > > > > > > We can consider this a bug-fix and backpatch it, but I am afraid that > > because this is a behavior change, some users may not like it. Also, I > > don't remember seeing public reports for this behavior; that is > > probably because it is hard to hit. FYI, we found this via BF > > failures. So, I thought it would be better to get this field tested > > via HEAD only at this point in time. > > At the moment, I don't have a strong opinion on this. Since no one has > encountered or reported this issue, it might be the case that it's not > affecting anyone, and we could simply backpatch without causing any > dissatisfaction. However, I'm fine with whatever others decide. >
Sawada-San, others, do you have an opinion on whether to backpatch this change? -- With Regards, Amit Kapila.
