On Fri, Mar 7, 2025 at 1:41 PM Jeff Davis <pg...@j-davis.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2025-03-07 at 12:41 -0500, Robert Treat wrote:
> > Ugh... this feels like a bit of the combinatorial explosion,
> > especially if we ever need to add another option.
>
> Not quite that bad, because ideally the yes/no/only would not be
> expanding as well. But I agree that it feels like a lot of options.
>
> > I wonder if it would
> > be possible to do something simple like just providing
> > "--include={schema|data|stats}" where you specify only what you want,
> > and leave out what you don't.
>
> Can you explain the idea in a bit more detail? Does --
> include=statistics mean include statistics also or statistics only? Can
> you explicitly request that data be included but rely on the default
> for statistics? What options would it override or conflict with?
>
There might be some variability depending on the default behavior, but
if we assume that default means "output everything" (which is the v17
behavior), then use of --include would mean to only include items that
are listed, so:
if you want everything --include=schema,data,statistics (presumably
redundant with the default behavior)
if you want schema only --include=schema
if you want "everything except schema" --include=data,statistics
So it's pretty easy to extrapolate data only or statistics only, and
pretty easy to work up any combo of 2 of the 3.
And if someday, for example, there is ever agreement on including role
information with normal pg_dump, you add "roles" as an option to be
parsed via --include without having to create any new flags.
Robert Treat
https://xzilla.net
