On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 03:34:06PM -0800, Jeff Davis wrote: > On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 14:33 -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote: >> + report_status(PG_WARNING, "warning"); >> + pg_log(PG_WARNING, "Your installation contains >> relations that may be affected by a new version of Unicode.\n" >> + "A list of potentially-affected relations >> is in the file:\n" >> + " %s", report.path); >> >> This may have been discussed upthread, but is a warning enough? That >> seems >> like something that could very easily be missed. > > There can be false positives, because even if such an expression index > exists, it's often not an actual problem. Do we want to stop an upgrade > from happening in that case? I doubt it, but if so, we'd need some kind > of option to bypass it.
I see. Do we provide any suggested next steps for users to assess the potentially-affected relations? -- nathan
